Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Brandon Nakashima vs Emilio Nava Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakashima vs Nava analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Nakashima vs Emilio Nava Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nakashima 2 - 0 Nava
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakashima has won 56.19% of points on their second serve, while Nava has won 50.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakashima, in recent form, has won 47.84% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nava has won 48.4%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.2% and 29.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakashima has saved 67.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nava has saved 65.42% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakashima has won 60.98% of matches played (W/L 50/ 32), with Nava winning 60.53% (W/L 46/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 29/ 27). Nava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 65/ 35), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 24/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75.61% of matches (W/L 31/ 10), where as Nava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.26% of matches (W/L 33/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nakashima winning 2 times and Nava being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 4 and Nava winning 1. The last match between Nakashima and Nava was at the M25 Rancho Santa Fe, 17-01-2020, Quarterfinals, Hard with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 6-1 3-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:50:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nakashima and Nava have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nakashima winning 1 times and Nava 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nakashima winning 0, and Nava 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakashima has played against opponents with an average rank of 235.4 while Nava has played against players with an average rank of 305.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakashima has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nava has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakashima has converted 33.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nava has converted 40.65% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
84
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
126
Rank
124
High
22
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
61% (193-121)
Career Total W/L
59% (173-118)
70% (35-15)
YTD W/L
56% (19-15)
$1,758,985
Career Prize Money
$402,385
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Brandon Nakashima | Emilio Nava |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 27 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:50:30 | 0:50:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (41/72) | 74% (57/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (31/41) | 54% (31/57) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (19/31) | 60% (12/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (34/77) | 31% (22/72) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Emilio Nava
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Brandon Nakashima | Emilio Nava |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 70% (35/15) | 56% (19/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (75/41) | 56% (44/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (637/545) | 51% (410/389) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (11/4) | 61% (11/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 65% (13/7) | 40% (4/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 73% (11/4) | 67% (4/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.66 | 0.63 |
| Aces Total | 379 | 246 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 74 | 107 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:27 | 1:47:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 274.3 | 302.44 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (2409/3733) | 62% (1602/2587) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (1802/2409) | 71% (1137/1602) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (744/1324) | 50% (493/985) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (108/323) | 41% (87/214) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (1432/3891) | 36% (897/2458) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 50% (2/2) |
| Masters W/L | 64% (7/4) | 43% (3/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (4/2) | 63% (5/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 77% (23/7) | 60% (9/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (33/47) | 56% (19/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 62% (18/29) | 29% (5/17) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (9/14) | 45% (5/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (33/29) | 84% (19/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (33/4) | 16% (19/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (16/5) | 20% (15/3) |
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Brandon Nakashima
62%
(
81 of
130)
1st Serve %
64%
(
88 of
137)
16
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
67 of
81)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
63 of
88)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
28%
(
37 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
50 of
137)
143
Total Points Won
124
|
6-7(2) 6-1 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
67%
(
71 of
106)
1st Serve %
61%
(
78 of
127)
13
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
60 of
71)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
69%
(
24 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
22 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
127)
136
Total Points Won
97
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
63 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
33 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
101)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(2) 6-7(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mariano Navone
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
39 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Francisco Comesana
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Emilio Nava
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
5
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jacopo Berrettini
61%
(
74 of
121)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
116)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
73)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
49 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
116)
120
Total Points Won
117
|
6-7(2) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexandre Muller
Player
Emilio Nava
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Emilio Nava
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
98)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
48%
(
40 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Emilio Nava
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Emilio Nava
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Nakashima Vs Nava Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
